Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 22, 2010, 12:02 AM // 00:02   #21
Academy Page
 
don_the_vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North!
Guild: The Guild With No [NAM트]
Profession: Mo/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

I like their "trust me, you did something wrong" attitude...
don_the_vito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 01:12 AM // 01:12   #22
Frost Gate Guardian
 
C4RB1N3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: Looking For One.
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by don_the_vito View Post
I was using the NCSoft "Ask a question" thing and would always go through the first level and GMs fine, then I would get a senior GM who says "we do not take appeals, blah, blah, blah" and then closes my question =( would you mind telling me where I could find their number?
The only way NCsoft can be reached by phone is:

Monday - Friday, 12pm - 5pm Central at (512) 225-6359.

But GM's who can take appeals have no way to be reached by phone, so if you are banned or have an in-game issue this phone number will not help you, and if you do call it be prepared to be on hold for at least an hour(no exaggeration).
C4RB1N3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 01:56 AM // 01:56   #23
Jungle Guide
 
Kumu Honua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by don_the_vito View Post
I like their "trust me, you did something wrong" attitude...
Me too. Cause they got it right. I have yet to see a single "I didn't bot!" post that I believed even in the slightest. Not one word has rung true by the "Innocent".
Kumu Honua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 02:59 AM // 02:59   #24
Academy Page
 
don_the_vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North!
Guild: The Guild With No [NAM트]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumu Honua View Post
Me too. Cause they got it right. I have yet to see a single "I didn't bot!" post that I believed even in the slightest. Not one word has rung true by the "Innocent".
I didn't bot, they probably thought I was botting because I've been doing the same things for five years -_-" sad thing is, you still see bots...

It's the same argument, people inject a .dll and get banned, people call them botters/hackers/cheaters/whatever and say they deserve it, sure some people who makes hundreds of dollars a week botting and who just steal cd keys anyways deserve to be banned, but some teenager who figured it might be interesting to see how they work gets banned after years of loyal play it is a pain and is very frustrating.

Just think, you log onto your account and oh wait, you can't because they say you cheated, how would you feel? To boot, they don't give you a reason, say they don't take your appeals and link you to the terms and conditions which says they can ban you for no reason anyways. Sounds like good customer service to me >_<
don_the_vito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 03:13 AM // 03:13   #25
Jungle Guide
 
Kumu Honua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by don_the_vito View Post
I didn't bot, they probably thought I was botting because I've been doing the same things for five years -_-" sad thing is, you still see bots...
Not one word has rung true by the "Innocent".
Kumu Honua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 03:36 AM // 03:36   #26
Academy Page
 
don_the_vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North!
Guild: The Guild With No [NAM트]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumu Honua View Post
Not one word has rung true by the "Innocent".
It's a program, it can be hacked by those who do not care for others. It's sad, but it is true.

The only reason "not one word has rung true" is because NCSoft thinks they have a fool proof system.
don_the_vito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 04:39 AM // 04:39   #27
Desert Nomad
 
Lanier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Guild: [Pink]
Profession: P/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowspawn X View Post
Issue is they were not wrongfully banned.
You can't possibly think that not one of the 3700 accounts was wrongfully banned. Everyone makes mistakes, and 3700 means a large possibility of making a few mistakes.
Lanier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 04:41 AM // 04:41   #28
Guest
 
Scarlett Romanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily Diehl View Post
Hey guys! Gaile has posted an FAQ on her wiki page that answers a bunch of questions the support team has been getting about bans. You can check it out here.
Some highlights for the viewers here

1. If you're banned, feel free to buy a new acct and come back to the game. :|



2. Looks like we can still justify banning you for the use of texmod, multi-launch, etc even though we said in a different thread they were okay to use. Yay!
Scarlett Romanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 06:09 AM // 06:09   #29
The Fallen One
 
Lord Sojar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oblivion
Guild: Irrelevant
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarlett Romanov View Post
Some highlights for the viewers here

*snip*

2. Looks like we can still justify banning you for the use of texmod, multi-launch, etc even though we said in a different thread they were okay to use. Yay!
If you are going to highlight things, try to not lie... it's very irritating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arena Net
Players know that we have not targeted "benign" software—the kind that does not give a player any sort of in-game advantage—and that we have no intentions of doing so in the future. Further, we can make it clear that we do not believe it is in our interest to specifically target the users of software of this sort. But that's as far as our reassurances can go.
__________________
Lord Sojar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 08:17 AM // 08:17   #30
The Hotshot
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Honolulu
Guild: International District [id多]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by User:Gaile Gray/Support FAQs/Bot Ban Details
Why doesn’t ArenaNet check out third-party programs and tell players which ones we can use?

We’re sometimes asked to review specific third-party programs, or to weigh in other on others as far as their acceptability for use with Guild Wars. However, we're simply not able to review, endorse, approve, or otherwise validate third-party software or software distributors. If third-party program developers sent us the code, we would not look at it. If they sent us an evaluation copy of the software, we would not run it. We have no staff employed to validate external software nor do we expect to offer that service in the future.

The actual work involved in properly testing and validating software should not be underestimated, but that's not the only issue. In addition to drawing valuable resources away from actual Guild Wars development and testing, officially approving third-party software would provide an avenue for hackers to take advantage of other players with the seeming approval of ArenaNet. Further, working more closely with outsiders to create acceptable programs would also potentially provide clues to bot-makers as to how to avoid detection in the future. All of these things would distract from continuing work on the game itself.
Does the fact that the creator of KSMod is affiliated with Arenanet developers and knows some of them personally have anything to do with its approval?
__________________

Interested in GvG? Want to watch some high-level PvP? Check out some streams and recordings!
lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 08:31 AM // 08:31   #31
Desert Nomad
 
Motoko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Guild: Zero Quality [zQ] /[LaG]/[USA]/[iQ]
Profession: A/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
Does the fact that the creator of KSMod is affiliated with Arenanet developers and knows some of them personally have anything to do with its approval?
I think we all know the answer to this one.
Motoko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 08:34 AM // 08:34   #32
Desert Nomad
 
Gill Halendt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default

Why doesn’t ArenaNet check out third-party programs and tell players which ones we can use?

Because they're ingenuous and still believe that people have some common sense nowadays.
Gill Halendt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 08:38 AM // 08:38   #33
Desert Nomad
 
Motoko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Guild: Zero Quality [zQ] /[LaG]/[USA]/[iQ]
Profession: A/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill Halendt View Post
Why doesn’t ArenaNet check out third-party programs and tell players which ones we can use?

Because they're ingenuous and still believe that people have some common sense nowadays.
It isn't so much as that as the game is old and so are these programs.

It is much like eggs in an ovary. Over time these eggs have the possibility of being mutated due to its environments.

These programs can be modified for good and for worse.

Thankfully we have doctors who can monitor those eggs.

As far as ANet watching these programs and protecting the player base (more new than old) I can't say the same.
Motoko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 03:17 PM // 15:17   #34
Krytan Explorer
 
jray14's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC, USA
Guild: Ohm Mahnee Pedmay [Hoom]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanier View Post
You can't possibly think that not one of the 3700 accounts was wrongfully banned. Everyone makes mistakes, and 3700 means a large possibility of making a few mistakes.
QFT. There's a lot of silly "holier than thou" talk going on in these forums claiming that everyone who got banned was actually guilty. But just take a look at ANet's history of poor attention to detail and oversight: weekend and holiday event announcements containing the same typos for years, support emails getting sent to the wrong recipients, web pages and game changes never meant to see the light of day being pushed live, etc. How can there not be a significant number of wrongful bans? Never mind about the validity or lack thereof of their bot detection techniques: I'm talking merely simple human error!
jray14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 03:38 PM // 15:38   #35
Academy Page
 
don_the_vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North!
Guild: The Guild With No [NAM트]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kumu Honua View Post
No it's because I don't believe a word you say.
If you knew me you would, but your just some ignorant douche who thinks everyone who got banned was some sort of hacker/botter.
don_the_vito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 05:24 PM // 17:24   #36
axe
Wilds Pathfinder
 
axe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Pwn Appetit [NJoy]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by don_the_vito View Post
If you knew me you would, but your just some ignorant douche who thinks everyone who got banned was some sort of hacker/botter.
The 3,700 /kick was not a judgement of morals or character, it was simply, "did you inject a dll" really that is the end of story. They are not calling you a cheater exactly, but they are making an example of you.

So while you may be a good honest person, you injected a dll.

Have a nice day
axe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 05:51 PM // 17:51   #37
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Emunator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Guild: DVDF
Profession: Mo/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axe View Post
The 3,700 /kick was not a judgement of morals or character, it was simply, "did you inject a dll" really that is the end of story. They are not calling you a cheater exactly, but they are making an example of you.

So while you may be a good honest person, you injected a dll.

Have a nice day
Let's give everyone the death penaly instead of parking tickets just to make an example.

Well i'm still waiting till Gaile get's back to me since she is still looking into my case.

And yes i could live with a temp ban, but a permanent one for what i did would be the same as my example just now.
Emunator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 07:46 PM // 19:46   #38
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Guild: Chipotle Mexican Bar and Grill [Inc]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emunator View Post
Let's give everyone the death penaly instead of parking tickets just to make an example.

Well i'm still waiting till Gaile get's back to me since she is still looking into my case.

And yes i could live with a temp ban, but a permanent one for what i did would be the same as my example just now.
Being banned from a game for cheating at the game is the same as being put to death for parking in the wrong spot? That's the worst comparison I've ever heard.

I have no idea about your situation and think it's possible they made mistakes; I just had to comment on the ridiculousness of your analogy.
Sapper_V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 08:22 PM // 20:22   #39
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Emunator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Guild: DVDF
Profession: Mo/E
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sapper_V View Post
Being banned from a game for cheating at the game is the same as being put to death for parking in the wrong spot? That's the worst comparison I've ever heard.

I have no idea about your situation and think it's possible they made mistakes; I just had to comment on the ridiculousness of your analogy.
Most of my posts are in another thread here on guru, and it is a comparison between paket fakor that shows all hero/zaishen emotes client side only and people that did actually used interupt/farm bots and did harm the economy and/or other players.
Emunator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 09:01 PM // 21:01   #40
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Anon-e-mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: @ Home
Guild: League Of Friends [LOF]
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by don_the_vito View Post
If you knew me you would, but your just some ignorant douche who thinks everyone who got banned was some sort of hacker/botter.
Only problem is, is that so far we have seen very little, if any evidence that anyone has been banned by mistake.

Last edited by Anon-e-mouse; Jun 22, 2010 at 09:09 PM // 21:09..
Anon-e-mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:40 AM // 04:40.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("